THE OSCARS AREN’T #SOWHITE, BUT THEY KIND OF DON’T MATTER

Why am I writing a post about the Oscars that isn’t about predictions or discussing the quality of the films in contention?

o-OSCARS-2013-facebook

Well, it could be because I haven’t seen a bunch of them yet.  But it could also be because the Oscars are racist.  You’ve probably heard.  Following last month’s nominations, which saw every best actor category occupied by a white actor, controversy gathered like a grey cloud over the lack of diversity the biggest movie awards in the world supposedly continues to display.  Spike Lee is boycotting (as if he wouldn’t at the first sign of a racial anything), there are calls for black presenters and host Chris Rock to stand down, and high profile actors like Will Smith and his wife, Jada, have admitted they won’t attend the ceremony on February 28th (even if he insists his role in the debate is minimal).

But what’s actually going on here?  Is this really a case of the Academy Awards being racist in their choices, or is it simply further commentary on the culture in which we currently live – a culture in which people just love to be offended.

Let me present you with a scenario.  If the situation was completely reversed, and every Best Actor/Actress and Best Supporting Actor/Actress nominee was non-caucasian, what would the reaction be?  Would there be any such outrage?  Would it even be acceptable to complain about it, or would that itself be deemed racist?  I suspect it would be the latter.  Charlotte Rampling spoke up recently about the plan to boycott this year’s ceremony, exclaiming that it’s racist to white actors – that perhaps the case is simply that the actors nominated really did give the best performances this year (you could argue Michael B. Jordan deserved a nod for Creed, but it’s hardly a massive snub).  When pressed further on the subject of introducing quotas to the awards system, Rampling went on to say “Why classify people?”.

Which is exactly it.

Diversity and equality is massively important.  Of course it is.  No-one’s arguing that.  But if we start putting quotas on things like awards, what do they really mean anymore?  It would just create further division and we’ll be descending into the kind of nanny state that would rather have schools who don’t allow winning or losing in sports for fear of upsetting the children.  If everyone’s a winner, no-one is.

If we must reserve a certain number of nominations for black actors, even if none of them deserve it (whether that’s actually the case or not this year is purely subjective), isn’t that unfair to those who give performances which really deserve recognition but because they’re white they’re overlooked?  It’s unfair to reserve places for anyone, any race, and by doing so here would only present black actors as a “special case”; as actors who deserve special treatment simply because of their race, which is exactly what people like Spike Lee and Will Smith don’t want.

artisans-thumbnail-the-revenant_clean

It’s a delicate subject with roots that go back through painful centuries of oppression, and I’m hardly going to sit here and pretend my opinion is the full stop in the argument.  Neither would I want anyone reading this to think I’m being unsympathetic.  It’s not about saying one side is wrong and one side is right (even labelling them “sides” feels problematic).  It’s about gaining perspective.  By labelling the nominations as racist and unfair, how must that make the likes of Leonardo DiCaprio feel?  One of the greatest living actors sans-Oscar who prepared for his role in The Revenant by eating raw bison and sleeping inside animal carcasses, and his peers are implying that maybe he shouldn’t be receiving nominations because he isn’t diverse enough.  Okay, with even further perspective we can’t feel too sorry for a man who has all the money in the world and looks every man would kill for, but it still must sting a little.

As it must sting Bryan Cranston, Matt Damon, Michael Fassbender, Eddie Redmayne, Cate Blanchett, Jennifer Lawrence, Brie Larson, Charlotte Rampling, Saoirse Ronan, Christian Bale, Tom Hardy, Mark Ruffalo, Mark Rylance, Sylvester Stallone, Jennifer Jason Leigh, Rooney Mara, Rachel McAdams, Kate Winslet and Alicia Vikander.

The Oscars don’t always get their winners right – in fact, they often get them completely wrong (Birdman over Whiplash and Boyhood, are you kidding?), but it’s not because they’re racist.  It’s because the people choosing the nominations aren’t actually secret movie wizards who know all.  They’re regular old farts who sometimes don’t even watch the films they’re voting for.  At the end of the day, instead of getting so upset about the lack of diversity, why not get upset about how The Oscars really aren’t as important as they used to be.

I’d still take one, though.

 

 

2 thoughts on “THE OSCARS AREN’T #SOWHITE, BUT THEY KIND OF DON’T MATTER

  1. This was well written and had a lot of good points. I thought that you tackled it with a good objective perspective. I still think that minorities are overlooked though. It seems as though only movies about slavery get black actors recognition but in all fair respect I haven’t seen many of the movies that are nominated or the performances of black actors that people argue certain actors should have been nominated for so I’m quite ignorant on the matter. Anyway I’m a newbie to blogging and was hoping if you’d like to give some feedback on my first post. I will be sure to check out more movie reviews of yours because I love reading reviews

    Here’s a link if you have time
    https://onlyindreamssite.wordpress.com

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s